Thursday, 18 July 2024

The colonial education in India


 Ancient education in India was based on Gurukul (studying in a school established by a teacher (Guru) as a part of his (rarely her) family for a number of years, typically twelve years). Students studied in gurus' ashrams (residential schools of teachers) and tols (schools in smaller size). Mostly they had to be residents. Various vocational and professional education were also imparted in this way. Large educational institutions, such as Nalanda, Vikramsila, and Taxila, flourished. Students used to come from far and wide to get education in those institutions. Similar educational institutions were also developed in the Islamic system during the Middle Ages. The famous madrasas at various places like Jaunpur, Agra, Bidar, Delhi, Lahore, Rampur, Lucknow, Allahabad, Ajmer, etc., thrived  with scholars and reputed teachers of that era. This education system of the ancient and medieval ages was mainly developed for the purpose of the upper classes of the society; the rich, the people engaged in religious leadership and governance. Mainly the study of language, religion and philosophy was the primary task. However, along with this, other subjects of human intellects such as geology, mathematics, astronomy, geometry, nature and biological sciences, history, etc., were also practiced.

 

Education system in the early days of English rule

 

The English did not think much about the education of the native people at the beginning of their rule. Primarily, they were busy looking for making money and profits from trade,  commerce and collection of taxes under the cover of native rulers. But gradually they felt the need and utility of direct rule. But to govern the native people they needed a class of people, who would establish common people's contact with the English rulers, as well as help them govern according to native customs. In 1781, the first British Governor General Warren Hastings (1732-1818) established the Calcutta Madrasa or Madrasa Aliya. The purpose of this establishment was to attract the Muslim gentry to government administration and appoint them to responsible positions. The curriculum included the content of the old Madrasas. For example, it consisted of metaphysics, grammar, justice, natural science or philosophy, astronomy, geometry and arithmetic. Although some felt the need to teach English to the natives (as Chaplain John Wayne of Bengal Presidency put this proposal), the government was not enthusiastic about it. Within a few years, a similar educational institution was built in Varanasi with the urge to appoint the gentlemen of the Hindu society in the administration like the Muslims. Notably until 1835, the official language was Persian in all the administrative offices, and law-courts.

 

A few contemporary European scholars ventured into the study of Indian culture, language and history during this period. On January 15, 1784, the 'Asiatic Society' was formed in Kolkata under the initiative of the then Supreme Court Justice William Jones (1746-1794). Since then, this organization has been playing an important role in introducing the outside world to Eastern as well as Indian philosophy, art, history, religion and literature. As a result, these enthusiastic European scholars also came into contact with some indigenous scholars. They also become familiar with European languages, religions and literature. On August 18, 1800, then British Governor General Lord Wellesley (1760 – 1842) inaugurated Fort William College in Kolkata. This college was established to train British administrative personnel. Departments of various Oriental languages ​​were opened there, including Bengali, Sanskrit, Arabic, Persian, Hindi and Urdu. Along with European scholars, native pundits and maulvis (religious scholars in Hinduism and Islam, respectively) were also appointed to this college. At that time Bengali was not the medium of education of the Bengali-speaking gentry in native centers of learning.  For example, in Tols, and  Maktabs (schools for Islamic teaching) etc.) studies were carried on in Sanskrit, Persian and Arabic. For this reason, the Bengali department of the college did not have a native teacher.  William Carey (1761-1834), the head of the Srirampur Baptist Mission, was appointed as the head of the Bengali department. He learned Bengali and Sanskrit from native scholars for the purpose of preaching Christianity. As the head of the department, he appointed Mrityunjay Vidyalankar (1763-1819) head pandit, and then Ramnath Bachaspati and Ramram Basu (1751-1813) as second and third pandits. With their help he translated the Bible into Bengali, and published Bengali grammars, dictionaries and other text books. Also many books were translated into Bengali and other languages ​​to meet the needs of college education. Mrityunjay Vidyalankar translated Batrish  Singhasanas (1802), Hitopades (1808) and Rajavali (1808) from Sanskrit in Bengali. The Bengali prose dawned by his writings. All these published books from Fort William College opened the door to reading in vernacular languages. Ramram Basu authored ‘Raja Pratapadity Charitra’ in Bengali in 1801. It was published from Serampore Mission Press and  considered to be the first original writing in Bengali.  Raja Rammohan Roy (1772-1833), the pioneer of Indian renaissance, translated Upanishads (Vedic theology) named Vedantagrantha in Bengali and published in 1815 from the publication department of this  college. Probably it is the first translation of Upansihads from Sanskrit in any native language.  Modern Bengali prose began its journey from Rammohan. He revealed the content of Upansihads to common Bengali-speaking people, and set the way to judge conventional social customs of Hinduism and interpretation of religion in its context. As a result of this, various writings from different scholars and intellectuals  were increasingly  published in Bengali and other native languages ​​on Indian religion and  philosophy, etc. This led to creation of  an enlightened atmosphere of arguments and debates in the society. At the same time, there was growing demand to learn English and to build educational Institutions  in the model of Western schools and colleges outside of traditional  centers of learning like, Pathshala (Native schools for children), Tol, Maktab, etc.

 

During this period, some Christian missionaries were encouraged to learn the local language and religion to spread the Christian religion in this country. William Carey took a leading role in this matter. He was the founder of the Baptist Mission in England and came to Kolkata in 1793 to preach Christianity. He believed that the publication and dissemination of the Bible in vernacular languages ​​was necessary for the spread of Christianity, and that was the reason he wanted to expand education in native languages. At that time, the East India Company did not allow foreign padres and missionaries  to preach Christianity. They felt that encouraging such religious propaganda would make natives hostile to the company rule. William Carey therefore established the Serampore Baptist Mission on the 10th January, 1800, along with his colleagues at Srirampur. Srirampur was a Danish colony. Hence British law did not apply there. At Srirampur, Carey established a printing press to print Bibles in Bengali and other Indian languages. This printing press played a very important role in publishing Bengali books. Almost all the early books, in particular, which were used as text books at the Fort William College, were printed from this press. In 1813, under pressure from the British Parliament, the East India Company allowed foreign missionaries to preach Christianity. At that time, many missionaries followed in the footsteps of William Carey, and established schools for the education of the native people. For example, in 1814, the London Missionary Society built 36 primary schools in Chinsurah  (Chunchurah , presently in the district of Hooghly in West Bengal).

 

Realizing the need for a more comprehensive education of the native people, the renewed charter of the East India Company in 1813 allocated a minimum annual grant of one lakh rupees for the education of Indians. It was decided to spend this money on language and science education in the territories of British India. This fund was also allowed to be used for the development of teaching in the existing colleges. David Hare (1772-1842) established the Hindu College in 1817 on the initiative of Raja Radhakanta Dev (1784 – 1867)  and other Hindu Bengali aristocrats to take advantage of this government initiative. Raja Rammohan Roy also took an important role in the establishment of this college. When conservative Hindu elites opposed his inclusion in the committee, he willingly kept himself outside it for the greater good. The purpose of establishing this college was to impart education in English as well as to attract and educate Hindu youth towards Indian religion, art and literature. However, at the juncture of the renaissance, they were more interested in European languages, literature and science. The curriculum was developed accordingly. Another example of a contemporary initiative was the establishment of the Calcutta School Society. It was built on the 1st September, 1818 by some European and Bengali scholars. The objective of this society was to reform the curriculum and introduce the same reading-learning system in the existing schools around Kolkata, as well as to establish new schools for teaching Bengali and English. In 1824, 66 such schools came under the purview of the society, which provided free tuition to meritorious poor students and also offered scholarships for further education in the Hindu college. Among these were several schools founded by David Hare. His compassionate and selfless work towards his students, especially his commitment to the development and nurturing of talented students, remains a shining example not only to the people of that time, but to all educators throughout the ages. The Calcutta School Book Society was formed in 1817 to publish text books according to the curriculum of all these schools. Although limited, these two organizations played pioneering roles in the early education system and inspired the formation of similar organizations in other regions. For example, School Book Societies were formed in Delhi and Madras. In Bengal, similar societies were established in Dhaka and Murshidabad. Apart from this, schools for teaching English were established by various private initiatives. For example, Raja Rammohan Roy opened one such school in 1816-17, which became known as the Anglo Hindu School in 1822.

 

During that time some other higher education initiatives were taken. In 1818, William Carey, Joshua Marshman (1768-1837)  and William Ward (1769-1823) founded Serampore College. The college was established to provide education in Indian languages, literature, arts, and Western science to native Christians and other youths. As already stated that then Srirampur was a Danish ruled territory,  on the 23 February 1827, the King of Denmark granted permission for the college to confer degrees in literature, arts and religion. The Serampore College is the first modern university in India in that sense. For much the same purpose, the Bishop's College at Shibpur in Howrah was established in 1818 to train Christian missionaries, and also to introduce native students to European languages, science and literature. On the 1st January 1824, during Lord William  Armherst's (1773 -1857) governorship, the Sanskrit College was established in Kolkata on the recommendation of James Prinsep (1799 – 1840)  and Thomas Babington Macaulay (1800 – 1859)  for the study of the Sanskrit language including  ancient Indian art, science and philosophy in  that language. Raja Rammohan Roy, however, recommended the establishment of an Institute  of learning modern subjects on arts, literature, and science through English instead of Sanskrit. The British government was not enthusiastic about his proposal then. Yet no contemplative education is confined to the narrow confines of its curriculum. Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar (1820-1891), one of the pioneers of the renaissance of that era, was trained in this Sanskrit college. He played one of the important roles in the expansion of education and social reforms in Bengal. He also advocated the inclusion of western science and literature without tying the curriculum to the boundaries of traditional Indian knowledge system.

 

Not only in Bengal, the demand for English and western education was increasing in Bombay, Madras and various provinces. In 1833 as a member of the legislative assembly, Macaulay recommended to educate Indians only in English. He suggested that the annual grant of Rs 1 lakh in the education sector from then onwards should only be spent for English education of western arts, literature and science. Finally in 1835, Governor General William Bentinck (1774-1839) and his council accepted Macaulay 's recommendations. Accordingly, it was decided to provide these grants only to the educational Institutes of European languages, literature and science, although indigenous educational institutions were allowed to continue. As some sections of the society expressed fears that English education was actually being introduced for the purpose of spreading Christianity, Lord Bentinck legally banned the activities of disparaging any native religion and promoting Christianity in educational institutions. After this, a few educational institutions were established under government initiatives. For example, colleges were founded in Hooghly, Dhaka and Patna. The Hindu College of Kolkata was handed over to the Government and renamed as the Presidency College. Apart from government initiatives, Christian pastors took care to promote the western education in English. Although their primary aim was to spread Christianity, people of other religions were also educated in these educational institutions as the curriculum included modern science, literature and art.

 

Along with general education, various professional higher educational programs also started during this period. A few institutions of studying modern medicine, engineering and law were established in Kolkata. In 1835, Lord Bentinck established the Medical College  in Kolkata to study western medicine. Later it was known as the Calcutta Medical College. Before this, the French had established a similar institution in Pondicherry. The foundation stone of the Calcutta Medical College was laid in 1848, and from 1851 it independently started offering a degree program. Initially, its students had to go to England to complete their academic requirements. A similar medical college in Chennai started teaching in 1842. Finally, in 1855, the Madras Medical College got the recognition of the Royal College of Surgeons in London. Likewise, a medical educational institution was established in Mumbai in 1845. It was also recognized by the Royal College of Surgeons in 1854.

 

Some early attempts of engineering education were observed from 1824 onwards. In 1843-44,  teaching of civil engineering was started at the Presidency College in Kolkata. Later in 1856 an independent Civil Engineering College was established in the Writers’ Building there. When the University of Calcutta was established in 1857, the college came under its control. In 1865, the college became a part of the Presidency College, and was run as a department. This system lasted until 1869. Then, it again assumed the role of an independent Institution. Finally, in 1880, it was established under the name of 'Government College, Howrah' at Shibpur. At that time, along with the civil engineering, the mechanical engineering was also taught. In 1921, the name of this college was changed to the 'Bengal Engineering College, Shibpur', which is now known as the 'Indian Institute of Engineering, Science and Technology' (IIEST), Shibpur. Initiatives were also taken to teach engineering in some places outside Bengal. Two engineering colleges were established in 1856 at Chennai and Mumbai. In 1847, a workshop was established at Roorkee in United Provinces (now in Uttarakhand) for the purpose of building canals along the Ganges. A civil engineering College named ‘College of Civil Engineering’, was established in the same year on the initiative of the Lieutenant Governor of the province to meet the needs for skilled craftsmen and engineers. By 1860, it was recognized as the best institution for engineering courses. That institution is now the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Roorkee.

 

From the beginning of the British rule, separate legal education of Hindus and Muslims continued in Benares Sanskrit College and Calcutta Madrasa, respectively. At the time of Lord Bentinck's educational reforms, on the recommendation of Macaulay, initiatives were taken to introduce law education in modern educational institutions on the model of the Western society. In 1842, the post of Professor of Law was created in the Hindu College, though it remained vacant for a long time. From 1855, educational institutions in Kolkata, Mumbai and Chennai introduced law courses.

 

Universal education

 

This initiative to spread the education of the society was mainly restricted to the upper caste Hindus especially to the Brahmins (castes associated with priesthood and education), Kayasthas (castes associated with governance and army), and Vaishyas (castes associated with trade and commerce). People of all other castes, especially the socially neglected lower classes (Sudras), were to be kept away from these educational institutions. Although the Christian missionaries were trying from the beginning to provide caste-neutral education, their main objective was always conversion. Hence, their efforts were not met with the general acceptance. Along with this, there were various discriminatory social barriers against women as a whole, due to which they were also excluded from the field of education. Foreign rulers also did not want to go against the native customs. So the extent of education that was spreading in the society was confined only among upper caste Hindu males. Although the caste system was not a scourge in Muslim society, men in that society were generally averse to Western education. That is why the spread of universal education was neglected even during the Renaissance. Raja Rammohan Roy dreamed of a caste-free Indian society and founded Brahmo samaj (society) and dharma (religion)  for achieving that goal. But,  in that samaj too,  there were not much  initiatives to spread education at all levels. Probably Rammohan's untimely and sudden death disrupted the adoption and implementation of programs complementary to his ideals and thoughts.

 

Women's education in this country began by the initiatives of Christian missionaries. In 1814, Robert May opened a school for girls at Chunchura. The government also helped him financially to run this school. When the Calcutta School Society was established, leading societal personalities like Radhakant Dev were interested in opening schools for upper caste girls. But the conservative society objected to women's education in an open environment outside. In 1819, the Calcutta Female Juvenile Society was formed by Baptist missionaries, and the society opened a girls' school. Due to the reluctance of the conservative society, it became difficult to get female students in that school. However, Christian missionaries and various European liberals began to take initiatives to open schools for girls in the country. In 1821 the Calcutta School Society entrusted the Church Missionary Society with the responsibility of promoting women's education. Soon the society established 8 schools and enrolled 217 female students. A major obstacle to female education was the lack of female teachers to teach girls. Along with society's objection to girls' education outside the home, it was unimaginable also that male teachers were teaching in these schools. At that time the British missionary Miss Mary Anne Cook (1783/4 – 1868, later Mrs. Mary Wilson) came to the country. She established 36 schools for girls with the help of the Church Missionary Society. But ordinary Hindu families did not send their daughters to these schools. In 1826, the Ladies Society for Native Female Education established a girls' school in Kolkata. Various dignitaries of the society, including David Hare, encouraged the establishment of this school. Baidyanath Roy, the son of Sukhmoy Roy, then the Raja of Posta, donated 20,000 rupees for this purpose. Lady Armherst (Sarah Armherst (1762-1838)), the wife of the then Governor General, laid the foundation stone of this school. They also undertook the management of Church Mission Society schools. Yet caste Hindu families were generally reluctant to send their girls to Christian missionary schools. All these schools were mainly for residential and orphan girls. The main goal of the missionaries was also conversion to Christianity, which also played a deterring role.

 

Some initiatives to establish secular girls' schools gradually emerged. In 1847, one such school, Kalikrishna Girls’ High School, was established by Kalikrishna Mitra (1822-1891) with the support from Nabinkrishna Mitra and Peary Chandra Sarkar (1823-1875) in Barasat (presently the district head quarter of  North 24 Parganas of West Bengal). This school continued to stand against the conservative society. During this time, Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar took an important role in promoting women's education. Education was also one of his programs in an effort to establish women's various rights against social discrimination. With his help, in 1849 John Drinkwater Bethune (1801-1851) founded Calcutta Female School (later Bethune School and Bethune College). Not only Vidyasagar, but many other generous enlightened personalities helped to establish this school. Among them were Dakshinaranjan Majumder, Shambhunath Pandit (1820-1867), Madanmohan Tarkalankar (1817-1858) and Ramgopal Ghosh (1815-1868). The Normal School was opened in 1866 to train adult women to compensate for the lack of female teachers. But the school was closed after three years as it did not get girl students from  Hindu families. Despite this, women Christian missionaries went door to door and undertook the education of women. But all these were very limited efforts. Overall the state of female education in the society was in shambles. In the latter half of the 19th century, the Brahmo Samaj, however, made the upper caste Hindu families aware of female education and took various initiatives.

 

Against the opposition of caste Hindus to educate the lower classes, the leadership for the spread of education arose from among the neglected sections of the society. In some places these became larger movements against social discrimination overcoming the direct and indirect barriers of conservatism. Notable among those who led these movements were Harichand Thakur (1812-1878), Guruchand Thakur (1846-1937), Jyotirao Govindrao Phule (1827-1890), Savitribai Phule (1831-1897), Fatima Sheikh (1831-1900) and others.

 

Harichand Thakur founded the Matua movement for the development and social recognition of the Chandal community (various castes of this community accepted their ethnic identity as Namashudras in a successful appeal to the British government in 1911) in the Varnashrama (a societal order designating a hierarchy of status, privileges, division of work,  rules of interactions, social practices such as marriage, participation in religious gatherings and festivals, etc., among different sections of populations with continued inheritance by birth. Chandals  (Shudras) were at the lowest strata of this caste system, still prevailing today in many parts of this country.). He is the founder of the Matua sect and religion. He felt the need of school and college education for their development from the very beginning. But at that time the people of the Chandal community had no access to ordinary schools, even to rural schools. He thus admitted his son Guru Chand Thakur to a madrasa. Guru Chand studied Persian and Arabic there. After his father's death, Guru Chand took the leadership among  the Matua community. In 1873, he organized the Chandal strike to demand social status and education. During this strike, the services of the upper caste people were stopped. Like his father, Guru Chand also emphasized on the development of education system for the lower caste people. Through their agitations and appeals, the British rulers also announced the principle of universal education without caste or religion. But in the caste-divided Hindu society, that people of all castes were receiving education in the same order, was unimaginable in that era. Hence the need to establish separate schools for the lower caste people was felt. In 1880, Guru Chand then opened a school for the lower castes at his residence in Oraikandi, his birthplace in the Faridpur district (presently in Bangladesh). He was helped by the Australian Baptist missionary Dr. C.S. Mead. Later in 1907, he established an English medium school named “Dr. C.S. Mead School”. Throughout his life, he insisted on establishing at least one Pathshala (a primary school) in every Namashudra village. During his lifetime, Guru Chand took a direct or indirect role in the establishment of thousands of such school. According to one statistic, 1812 such schools were established between 1881 and 1831. Many of these schools were for girls and some of them were for both boys and girls.

 

In Maharashtra, Jyoti Rao Govind Rao Phule and his wife Savitribai Phule chose the spread of education as a key tool in their struggle for acquiring social status and rights for the Dalit community in the region. They themselves belonged to the lower caste Mali community. Jyoti Rao completed his education in Poona Scottish Mission High School in 1847. He became aware of social discrimination against women and backward classes and felt the need to educate them to overcome this discrimination. At first he taught his wife at home. Then they both established a girls' school in their own residence in 1848. Later in 1851-52 they opened two more girls' schools. For this they had to endure opposition from their own community. Jyoti Rao's father evicted them. At that time they were under the shelter of Jyoti Rao's friend Usman Sheikh and his sister Fatima Sheikh (1831-1900). With the help of some of their friends and Christian missionaries, they still kept  these schools running. Fatima Sheikh also taught in their five schools. She was probably the first female teacher from the Muslim community in India. Fatima also opened two more schools in Mumbai in 1851. By 1858, Jyoti Rao and Savitribai opened 8 schools. In 1874, Jyoti Rao formed the Satya Shodhoka Samiti for the spread of rational thought against social superstitions, priestcraft, idol worship, casteism, etc. In 1882, in the Education Commission formed to review the education system in India, he appealed for introduction of special schemes and government assistance for the education of lower caste people. To the policy makers, he sent a proposal for  making primary education compulsory for all. The British rulers, however, were not particularly interested in going against conservative societies, although they did not deny its rationale in principle.

 

Later, in the movements of Yothi Thas (1845-1914), Guruchand Thakur (1846-1937), Erode Venkatappa Ramaswamy Periyar (1879-1973), Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar (1891-1956), Raghunath Murmu (1905-1982), etc., awareness for education among the lower castes increased. Various social, religious and political organizations were formed against Brahmanism, along with the demand for universal education. It may be said here that since the anti-British national movements were mainly led by caste Hindus, the leading sections of the lower classes refrained from participating in these movements. Many times it was seen that the Christian missionaries became allies in their struggle against the deprivation of caste Hindu society. For that reason some of them considered the rule of a foreign country  better than the rule of upper castes. The national anti-colonial movement could not become all-encompassing because of that. Due to the reflection and predominance of the Brahmanical philosophy in the national movement, the Muslim society gradually became alienated from this movement and demanded an independent homeland. As a result of which the independence of the country came through division  in two parts.

 

In 1937, Mahatma Gandhi (1868 – 1948) in his Harijan newspaper called to spread a basic education system to all levels of society. With that call, the National Congress organized the 'All India National Education Conference' at Wardha in Maharashtra on October 22-23, 1937. There three resolutions were adopted for a scheme of universal education. The first of these was the introduction of a seven-year free and compulsory education program for children across the country. Secondly, the medium of education should be their mother tongue. And the last resolution was Gandhiji's commitment to make foundational training on various crafts and practices of social integration as a part of this education. That is, the character of this education should not be limited to the theoretical education that gives exam-oriented degrees, but it should be integrated with the practical craftship and community work in harmony with society and environment. Accordingly, a committee headed by Dr. Zakir Hussain (1897 – 1969), who later became the President of the independent India, submitted the report of the first National Basic Education Scheme in 1938. This report played an important role in the development of universal primary education after independence.

 

 

Higher education conducted by universities

 

In 1854, Charles Wood (1800 – 1885) presented his proposals for educational reform in India (Wood's dispatch) to a meeting of directors of the East India Company. These brought about fundamental changes in the curriculum and structure of higher education. According to the demands of the colonial regime, only education for English, Western science and literature were given the official recognition. Along with English as a medium of education, learning of native languages ​​were also agreed upon. Following this policy, higher education was provided in India on the pattern of Western education. In 1856, three universities were established in Kolkata, Bombay and Madras in the model of London University. These universities were recognized for awarding diplomas and degrees. A degree could be of two types, namely,  a plain Bachelor’s degree, and a Bachelor’s degree with honors. Along with the introduction of courses in various branches of arts and sciences, academic programs offering degrees in medicine, engineering and law were also introduced during this period. In universities, the Chancellor, Vice-Chancellor and Senate formed the governance structure for administrative and academic functions. Ex-officio, the Governor General of India (in Kolkata), and the Provincial Governors of Madras and Bombay were appointed Chancellors of these Universities at their respective places. The senate was responsible for overseeing financial management, prescribing the curriculum and conducting degree-granting examinations. The Senate of Calcutta University had 38 members out of which 6 were Indians. In the Bombay University 5 of the 29 members of the Senate were Indians, and in the Madras Senate of 40 the number was 3.

 

Initially in the universities, academic programs were run  in four faculties. They were Arts, Engineering, Medicine and Law. Later Science was added to them as the fifth faculty. Subjects related to any religious faith and practice were kept out of the curriculum. In the beginning, there was no system of teaching in the universities. Teaching continued in their affiliated colleges, although the relationship of colleges with universities was not well defined. Colleges, established in the provinces of Bombay and Madras, were affiliated to their respective universities. But the boundaries of Calcutta University were not fixed in that way. Every year the universities used to conduct entrance examinations for joining various degree courses in these colleges. Examinations were  conducted on various subjects as per the syllabus prescribed by the Senate. Students studied in different private schools, and prepared according to the syllabi of these examinations. It was not mandatory for the schools and colleges  to be under the control of Government or any University for setting their curriculum, teaching and evaluation methodologies.

 

On the 24th January 1857, the Governor General approved the Bill for the establishment of those three Universities, and they started functioning soon after. 244 candidates participated in the first entrance examination of the Calcutta University in 1857. 162 of them were successful. Only 13 appeared in the first degree examination held in 1858. Out of them only two succeeded. Among them was Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay (1838-1894), the first novelist of the Bengali literature, and the composer of Vande Mataram.

 

Gradually this education system spread its roots in the society. Although no new university was established in the next 25 years, middle-class interest in higher education and entrance examinations had been increasing. In 1882, 7,429 people appeared for the entrance examination of these three universities, of whom 2,778 passed. The number of affiliated colleges also increased from 27 to 75. In the first 14 years, where 2666 passed the First Arts Examination (Intermediate Examination), the number increased to 5969 in the next 11 years. Similarly in B.A. and M.A courses, the numbers of successful candidates rose from 850 to 2434, and 151 to 385, respectively. According to a report of the Education Commission in 1883, in Bengal-Bihar-Orissa, there were 133 high schools in 1871. In 1883 the number increased to 209. Notably,  this increase in the number of schools was mainly due to private initiatives. The number of government aided schools rather decreased. Managements of Bangla High Schools were more interested in running their schools outside the government control. The students in all these schools used to study mostly with the interest of appearing in entrance examinations, and clearing them. The syllabus of that examination was the indirect regulator of all these schools.

 

In 1882, the British government set up the Education Commission to review the progress of education in the past twenty-five years following Wood's proposal. That commission recommended that the government might provide limited autonomy to universities by shrinking government grants to expand education. Along with this, it advised on general and special types of financial assistance in colleges, regulation of annual cost of education, various changes in the rules for awarding honorary scholarships, introduction of new courses, etc. The government accepted various recommendations of this commission and also directed to submit a report to review the financial management of the universities. This report on the income and expenditures of colleges between 1881 and 1885 was published in 1886. It highlighted that, while Calcutta and Madras Universities were running without government grants, Bombay University required a small amount of these grants. In addition, the Punjab University, India's fourth university established in Lahore in the North Western Province in 1882, required larger grants. In 1887, the fifth university was established in Allahabad.

 

The adoption of the recommendations of the Education Commission of 1882 accelerated the rate of expansion of higher education. In the next two decades, 121 more new colleges were established. In 1901-02, there were 126 colleges in British India, and 53 in Burma (present Myanmar), Ceylon (present Sri Lanka) and other loyal native kingdoms in British India. The number of students in these colleges also increased rapidly. Mainly the attraction of government jobs was the focus of their interest. The number of high schools also increased at the same time.

 

Increasing demand for higher education and government reins

 

In 1902, the government constituted the University Commission in an attempt to find a solution to the crisis of infrastructural inadequacy in colleges as their survival was primarily dependent on tuition fees. The commission was asked to suggest measures to enhance excellence in higher education. According to the recommendations of the commission, the University Act was enacted in 1904. It expanded the senates, syndicates and faculties of the universities to include a substantial number of representatives of university teachers. The number of members of the Senate was kept at a minimum of 50 and a maximum of 100. Affiliation rules for colleges were tightened. Syndicates were empowered to verify compliance with conditions of affiliation. One of the reforms introduced during this period was to allow universities to start their own courses. They are allowed to recruit manpower in faculty positions, such as lecturers and professors. Students were allowed to be taught in universities and to conduct research with them. The Governing Body of each college was restructured and reconstituted.

 

These government reforms, however, did not satisfy Indian educationists and managements of educational institutions. The decision to start teaching in universities had been announced before, but no concrete action was taken by the Government to implement it. Hence they remained sceptical about its outcome. Further, they did not also welcome greater government control through syndicates. As a result, several colleges went out of the affiliation of an  university. At that time, the growing nationalist movement and various initiatives were taking in shape to educate Indians outside the government universities. Two of these were Gurukul Kangri in Haridwar (presently in Uttaranchal) and National Council of Education in Bengal. The current Jadavpur University was founded by the latter organization. Subsequently, in continuation of this movement, the Jamia Millia Islamia University was established in Aligarh in 1920 under the leadership of Mahmud Hasan Deobandi (1851-1920), and with the initiatives from other Muslim intellectuals such as Mohammad Ali Jauhar (1878-1931), Hakim Ajmal Khan (1868-1927), Zakir Hussain, Mukhtar Ahmed Ansari (1880-1936),  Abdul Majid Khwaja (1885-1962), etc. to bring the Muslim students under the influence of  the nationalist education movement. At that time, they  felt that the management  of the Aligarh Muslim University were in favor of the British government. That was why they built a separate new university. This university moved to Delhi in 1925 and in 1936 its campus was established at Okhla near Delhi. Another notable event of this period was the establishment of Viswa Bharati University at Shanti Niketan, Birbhum by Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941) in 1921. Outside the traditional education system, Rabindranath took the initiative to develop this institution as a center for the practice of Indian culture with exposures to international philosophy, literature and art. Before this, however, he had established a school (Brahmacharyashram) there in 1901, modeled after his father's teachings.

 

However, all those various efforts were not sufficient to meet the overall demand of higher education, especially for the education of science and technology in the society. Nationalist political leaders and academics were always keen to exploit the limited autonomy of universities and the strategy of maintaining constant pressure against the colonial government's reluctance to expand higher education in India.

 

Due to the tightening of government control, the private initiatives for running colleges got dampened. This trend continued for the next two decades. In 1912, the number of affiliated colleges decreased to 170. In 1922 that number increased slightly to 207. But the demand for degrees from all these colleges was increasing. The number of degree holders was around 20,000 in 1902. By 1922. it had grown to nearly 50,000.

 

In 1913, the government expressed its desire to transform the universities into teaching institutions rather than simply granting affiliations. It also planned to open more new teaching and residential universities. Permissions to establish such new universities in Dhaka, Aligarh and Varanasi were granted. In addition, plans to establish at least one university in each province were announced. It was planned to establish universities in  Rangoon, Patna and Nagpur. This process was delayed by the First World War. Two new universities were established in Varanasi and Patna in 1916 and 1917, respectively. Pundit Madan Mohan Malviya's (1861-1946) contribution to the establishment of Benares Hindu University (BHU) in Varanasi is well known. It was intended to be a center for the development and study of Hindu culture, and the practice of applied sciences. The University of Patna was established to promote education in the newly combined state of Bihar and Orissa.

 

 

Introduction of postgraduate education and transition to universities

 

In 1916, the  Calcutta University under the leadership of Ashutosh Mukherjee (1864-1924) decided to establish various departments to  directly impart postgraduate education. The appointments of lecturers and professors also began for this purpose. The issue of government negligence in this regard has already been mentioned. The government then could no longer ignore the matter and constituted a commission, named the Calcutta University Commission,  to look into the various issues related to the administration and academic affairs of the university. This commission submitted their report in 1919. The report contained various recommendations for reforming  secondary (school) and university education. One of these recommendations was the formation of A Board for Secondary and Intermediate Education and the transfer of Intermediate Education from the University to that Board. The time limit for graduate level degree courses was proposed to be three years. It was also recommended to establish a real teaching university in Kolkata. Along with that, it proposed  to take measures for improving the quality of colleges in urban and semi-urban areas, and to build  new universities by converting a few of  them. The commission also emphasized on the promotion of women's education. The commission felt that while the vernacular languages should remain as the  medium of instruction in schools, it should  only be English in the higher education. Apart from this, the commission also said that there was a need for a radical change in the examination system. Despite the commission's recommendations, there had been no serious effort to implement them at the government level. This was mainly due to the reluctance to provide necessary funds and the colonial attitudes in suppressing the desire for higher education. According to the recommendation of this commission, the Central Advisory Board of Education (CABE) was formed in 1920, but it was kept mostly defunct, and  was demolished in 1923.

 

In Bengal, a university was established in Dhaka (presently the capital of Bangaldesh) following the implementation of one of the recommendations of this commission. Direct postgraduate education was introduced there as it was practiced then in  Calcutta University. A similar university was established in Rangoon (Present name Yangon, capital of Myanmar) in 1920. Like the University of Calcutta, postgraduate education was introduced in the Universities of Madras and Bombay in 1923 and 1929, respectively. All these universities encouraged their faculty to engage in higher research. Because of that, they were largely freed from the responsibility of teaching regular subjects.

 

Some universities were founded in the native kingdoms. In 1916,  Maharaja Krishnaraja Wadiyar IV (1884-1940), Raja of Mysore,  established the first university directly outside British territory. It started providing education in Mysore and Bangalore. In 1918, Mir Osman Ali Khan (1886-1967), the Nizam of Hyderabad, established Osmania University. Urdu was the medium of instruction there. In 1920, the Mohamedan Anglo-Oriental College established by Sir Syed Ahmad (1817-1898) in 1875, was transformed into Aligarh Muslim University (AMU). This university was established to introduce the Muslim community to Western higher education in the context of their culture. Earlier, the Central Hindu College established by Annie Besant (1847-1933) in Varanasi in 1916 for Hindus with a similar objective, was renamed Banaras Hindu University (BHU). Pundit Madan Mohan Malviya played one of the leading roles in building this university as mentioned before.

 

 

Expansion of Higher Education after Calcutta University Commission Report

 

In 1921, the provincial government of United Provinces (now Uttar Pradesh) established an independent body for the management of high school education on the recommendation of the Calcutta University Commission. This body, named ‘The Board of High School and Intermediate Education’,  started conducting degree-granting examinations. Later the British Government set up a similar organization for schools in Ajmer, Gwalior, Mewar and Madhya Pradesh. Its present name is the ‘Central Board for Secondary Education in India’.

 

 A university was established at Lucknow in 1921 in the United Provinces on the recommendation of the Calcutta University Commission. Later Canning College and King George Medical College were affiliated to that university. Likewise, three colleges of Allahabad also became parts of Allahabad University. They were Muir Central College, Ewing Christian College, and Kayastha Pathshala College. Some other universities were established during this period, such as each in Delhi, Nagpur, Andhra, Agra, and the Annamalai University in Madras in 1922, 1923, 1926, 1927, and 1929, respectively. Raja Annamalai Chettiar's (1881-1948) financial support played a major role in establishing the latter university.

 

The Inter University Board (IUB) was formed in 1925 to coordinate all the universities. The Vice-Chancellors of the Universities or their nominees were the members of this board. It was not a regulatory body. However, the management and teaching problems of universities were discussed there, and various recommendations were made accordingly. Also various publications related to university education were made from this board. A conference was held every five years to elect delegates to international academic conferences, and to assist in the accreditation of university degrees. In 1967 it was recognized as a society in the independent India, and in 1973 it was renamed the Association of Indian Universities.

 

Colonial indifference in the expansion of higher education

 

The indifference of foreign rulers to the expansion of higher education was also revealed in the 1928 report of the Simon Commission formed by eight British MPs. The commission submitted its report in 1929. Although this commission was formed for the purpose of constitutional and social reforms in British India, it did not make any effective recommendations regarding education. The committee performed its duty with a satirical remark that the universities were only playing a role in awarding degrees, and with an expression of satisfaction in the overall expansion of higher education.

 

In the next several years, no new university was established in India. Not only the indifference of the rulers, but  the global financial crisis and political crisis also may have been one of the reasons for this. In 1935, the Central Advisory Board of Education (CABE) was reconstituted. However, it did not provide any push to the government effort in the expansion of education. In 1937 Maharaja Chithira Thirunal Balaram Varma (1912-1991) of Travancore founded the University of Travancore. It is now known as the University of Kerala.

 

 

Initiatives near the end of the British rule

 

In 1943, the Central Advisory Board of Education (CABE) in a report, made several important recommendations for the general expansion of higher education and universal education in India. It was recommended to develop universal primary and secondary education systems as stepping stones to   higher education. Along with that, the need and plans for setting up new universities were outlined. One of these suggestions was the setting up of a University Grant Commission (UGC). It was formed in 1945. Initially it was meant for the three universities of Delhi, Aligarh and Varanasi. In 1947, it was appointed to monitor all universities in India.

 

Due to various efforts of this kind, some universities were established during this period. In 1943, Utkal University was established in Bhubaneswar, Odisha. A university was established in Sagar in Madhya Pradesh in 1946. It was established with the financial support of Shri Hari Singh Gour (1870-1949). Today it is known as Dr. Hari Singh Gour University after its founder. The last university established in British India was Rajputana University in Jaipur, now known as Rajasthan University. It was established on the 8th January 1947. However, it should be noted here that although some universities were established immediately after independence, they were planned in the pre-independence years. For example, universities are established in Guwahati in 1947, Poona, Roorkee and Kashmir in 1948, and Baroda in 1949. The University of Roorkee was the conversion of the erstwhile Engineering College.

 

 

A brief outline of the evolution of the colonial education system

 

As concluding remarks, let us summarize briefly the highlights of our discussion regarding  the beginning and the growth of education in colonial India.

 

(1)   Initially the foreign rulers did not bother with native education beyond their commercial gains. However, at the insistence of the administration, some sort of education program was introduced to acclimatize its own civil servants to the native language and customs. There, the native language education and as well as a limited initiative to teach the English language to the native people of high social status, had to be taken. The new rulers were also hesitant about the antipathy of the social system. That is why they adopted the traditional Indian education system and curriculum of that time and allocated government funds. From 1813, every year there had been  an allocation of Rs.1 lakh for indigenous educational institutions.

(2)   These rulers had an initial reluctance to spread modern Western education. On the one hand, they feared that the indigenous people would become their intellectual and emotional equals, and that the free thought of the West would awaken their desire for nationalism and autonomy.

(3)    Although most of the rulers had this mindset, a section of free-spirited Western intellectuals and native scholars started to develop and expand modern Western education in a limited way. Along with this, the Christian priests were involved in the promotion of modern education in the West with the urge to spread Christianity and the appeal of general religious humanism.

(4)   As the direct British rule was established over large areas of India, the need for a class of native workers trained in the English language became acute for the British rulers. That was why the government accepted the recommendation of Thomas Babington Macaulay in 1935 to accept Western education as the main program of national education of British India, and provide education in English. Along with this, the system of providing financial incentives to all domestic educational institutions was also withdrawn.

(5)   The British Government was in favor of developing only that structure of education which was capable of meeting the needs of their administrative infrastructure and other social services including administration. Due to this, they did not have a program to provide universal primary education, nor did they have an urge to expand higher education. Reluctance to allocate funds for expansion and reform of education was one of the reasons. On the other hand, caste Hindu society was not only indifferent to providing education to the lower class people, but also directly opposed it. In response to this,  movements for the expansion of education were developed from that class as independent initiatives. These movements were parts of the movements against apartheid deprivation.

(6)   Socially, the interest and desire for Western science education had been gradually increasing. Foreign rulers could not ignore it completely. That was why the expansion of higher education was slow, but limited. In 1856, three universities were established in Kolkata, Mumbai and Chennai. At the same time, education in various professions including engineering, medicine and law were introduced. These universities initially monitored and evaluated the teaching standards and arrangements of the colleges affiliated to  them only. Along with that the degree awarding examinations were organized. An annual entrance examination was conducted for admission to higher education. Various lower and higher schools were imparting education to the students following  the syllabus of that examination. Those schools did not receive any government financial support, nor were they under direct government control. In fact, primary and secondary level education was associated with social education movement. But its expansion was also very slow and insufficient.

(7)   There were constant attempts by the colonial rulers to stifle the desire of Indians for higher education through various tactics. On the other hand, it was not possible for them to directly oppose the modern rationale of expansion in education. Therefore, the main weapon of this resistance to the expansion of education was non-allocation of funds. Along with this, there was interference in the independent management of colleges and teaching courses, not giving recognition to the opening of new universities, opposing direct teaching in universities and reducing the representation of Indians in university committees and senates.

(8)    Indian educationists continued their struggle in the educational arena against this indifference and cold resistance of the foreign rulers. They sought to make the universities financially self-sufficient, and so increasingly universities began to launch their own courses and research. Socially, the expansion of higher education was also associated with nationalist movements. Various independent institutions of higher education were established.

(9)    Sensing the neglect of the foreign rulers in spreading universal education, an education conference was held at Wardha in Maharashtra in 1937 at the call of the National Congress to formulate a national education policy. In that conference, a seven-year free and compulsory basic education program was announced for children at all levels of the country. This program played an  important role in the expansion of primary education in post-independence India.

(10)  Such was the  administrative structure of higher education left behind by the British when they left India. The universities were under the supervision of the University Grants Commission (UGC). Central Advisory Board for Education (CABE) was functional for providing educational advice. The Inter-University Council (IUB) acted as an advisory body to the coordination of universities. These three organizations continue to play their roles in post-independence India as well.

 

(Original article written in Bengali on 22/8/2023, and translated on 16/7/2024 in English).

 

(Ack. https://translate.google.com)

 

 

Sunday, 7 May 2023

Preface of the book "Off and On the Track: My memoirs and reflections"

 

All my blogs written before this year, which were available in this site,  are recently published  as a compilation in a book entitled “Off and On the Track: My memoirs and reflections”.  I am providing the preface of this book and also the details for getting a copy of this book  for interested readers.

 

7th May, 2023

____________________________________________________________________

                   

 

This year I turned sixty. A right age to be considered for a celebrity to write his or her memoirs. I do not belong to that class, and rightfully did not ever consider to bring out a memoir of my own! But when a few of my research students were planning to have a reunion honoring my entry to the senior citizenship, I seriously contemplated on the possibility of such a publication on this occasion. Fortunately, I did not have to make much effort as I took fancy on writing blogs more than a decade ago. Some were related to my experiences and thoughts on various issues around my profession. Some were off-the track descriptions of a few events and encounters of my life at various stages. When I expressed my wishes to my friend Aikat-da (Dr. Subhas Aikat), he readily agreed and immediately started planning for this publication. He also composed the first draft with the compilation of my blogs and forwarded to me for my inspection. Still I was hesitant. I am never confident about my writing in English, be it technical or non-technical! So, I wrote to Pradip-da (Pradip Baksi) seeking his guidance and comments on my manuscript. I met Pradip-da as a fellow patient staying in the same room during my brief stay in a hospital in Kolkata in January 2021 and was greatly fascinated by his scholarship and knowledge in several disciplines. He has translated the Mathematical Manuscripts of Karl Marx and wrote some articles and books in Bengali and English on some aspects of human thought, society and the rest of nature. I was extremely happy and relieved when I got positive response from him.

 

When things were starting to gain a momentum, I lost my father suddenly on the 24th of February, this year. He had been suffering a lot for the last two years. For a week, he was under intensive treatment in a hospital in Kolkata and was struggling with oxygen support and feeding through rice tubes. Yet, we were not prepared for his sudden departure from life. For the last one year, my father was living like a child, requiring all the assistance from two of his attendants, who took great care of him   for days and nights. He was under the care and supervision of my sister and brother-in-law in our home. His illness got aggravated since the days of his suffering from COVID-19 in November, 2020. We used to visit him regularly. In these years, my home-coming and all our activities in my home were centered around him. His sudden loss created a big void within me.  Everything appeared to me to be quite meaningless and for a few weeks, I kept myself almost withdrawn from any outward interaction. Naturally, the planned reunion of my students got cancelled and at one point of time, I practically lost my motivation for bringing out this compilation.

 

When Pradip-da mailed me, the copy-edited version of this manuscript, I was repenting about the fact that he took so much trouble on my request. I could see how much time and effort he had to put in this task. I am not sure whether these texts are worthy for such a treatment. He not only corrected my English at several places and restored some of my idioms and expressions to their proper usage, but also enriched the text by providing various information on related matters and suggesting moderations of some of my analysis of socio-political issues with his wisdom and scholarship. I take this opportunity to express my deep gratitude to him for his engagement with these texts.

 

Even in my mature years I never contemplated about writing anything non-technical in English. During the years of my early schooling, I always felt uneasy and incompetent about handling several subjects. I would have been in much more trouble, had I not been rescued by the careful guidance and teaching of  my  respected teacher and beloved mentor, Sri Arun Bhattacharyya. He not only taught me the languages, English and Sanskrit, but groomed me by developing my taste for the liberal arts and poetry. Sadly, he is also no more with us.  Throughout my interaction with him, I fondly addressed him as ‘Sir’. If my reader found anything worthy in this exercise, it is primarily due to his teaching and mentoring. I take this opportunity to dedicate this book to honor his memory.

 

No words are enough for expressing my indebtedness to my friend Aikat-da, who always supported me in this endeavor. This publication would not have been possible without his support. Finally, I thank all members of my family, my relatives, teachers, mentors, friends and students for their blessings, guidance, encouragement, friendship, love and respect that they extended to me throughout my journey.

 

 

The 28th of March, 2023

 

___________________________________________________________________


 



ISBN: 978-81-954813-9-2
Page 256, Rs.450

For copies contact:- CORNERSTONE PUBLICATIONS, Ramesh Dutta Sarani, P.O. Hijli Co-operative, KHARAGPUR-721306, e-mail Address― cspublications.india@gmail.com

To get a copy of the book, the price of the book i.e. Rs.450 may be deposited to the bank a/c given below along with an intimation and postal address to cspublications.india@gmail.com
The payment should always be made in Indian rupee and the book will be delivered by registered parcel within India only.


CORNERSTONE PUBLICATIONS  
Our Bank - Punjab National Bank, IIT Kharagpur Branch;
IFS Code PUNB0387200;
A/C Name-Cornerstone Publications; A/C No.-3872002100000827




 

 

Friday, 14 February 2020

AI-ML and our society


After a tortuous reception at the immigration counter at Narita I was quite relieved to find myself before my coach of Narita Express waiting for me to take me to Shinagawa, from where I need to change for my final destination at Tsurumi near Yokohama. I was attending  a conference at Yokohama. When I landed Narita, I never imagined that it would take about two hours to cross the immigration counter. So when I went for collecting my luggage I was dead tired and also a bit worried to change the international SIM in my I-phone for making a call back home. I also needed to book a ticket for a train to travel to Tsurumi. At the JR East Travel Service Center when I could easily got those tickets and directions, I was very relieved and took a deep breath by comfortably placing myself on a sofa near the counter to arrange my newly bought tickets and other travel documents. There was about 15 minutes gap for my train. I might have stretched my relaxation too long! Suddenly I felt a rush to look for the platform and train. Impulsively I went as quickly as possible. After going through a bit of beginner’s nervous lesson to get entry through the automatic ticket checking system, I could finally reach the platform and found my train waiting there. With an immense relief I boarded it and placed my hand bag overhead. The first thing I tried was to change the new SIM card and found that it worked nicely by calling home to inform about my arrival and also calling my student Jit who arrived there last Evening for attending the same conference. Eventually the train started towards its destination.
The coach was quite empty. Most passengers appeared to me traveling alone and belonged to younger generation, absorbed on their laptops or smartphones. A few were also reading books. There was a display hanging overhead, with scrolling messages of places of destination in alternate in two different Japanese scripts and also in English. In the mean time the next station came, which happened to be Terminal 1 of Narita Airport and a few passengers entered into the coach. I was quite relaxed and was excited to get an experience of a fast moving Japanese train. My excitement got a little dampened, when I understood that Narita Express was not of that category. It moved fast but not like the famous Shinkansen (bullet train) of Japan. I went for an inspection of my coach to look for the toilet, and was very pleased to find a neat and clean arrangement in the moving train. While returning I also observed how luggage were kept near the door and a few of them were locked by an iron chain with electronic locking mechanism. In fact in the display there was a message regarding the use of this lock and also a warning that if it  could not be opened it had to be collected from the final destination. I came back to my seat and was eagerly looking forward to reach the transit station of my destination.  When the train was approaching the next station, I heard an announcement of the approaching station with a request to the passengers to be ready for  getting down and also to carry  their luggage near the exit door. I hummed  in my mind, “At least I need not worry and bother on my luggage.”, and looked at my small companion placed on the upper bunk over my seat. I was traveling with my hand bag only. Then a queer sensation gripped me. I felt something was missing with me and realized I should have a luggage with me in this travel, which I did collect from the airport, but left at the JR East Travel Service Desk. More than feeling myself disgusted I was amazed how such an amnesia could overtake me for about half an hour! In a foreign land, I lost my luggage with all my clothing and other necessary items inside. My only consolation then was that I had all my cash and travel documents safe with me!
I was wondering what should be my action at that point! Should I  take the loss with a stoic’s heart and look for making some contingency arrangement for a few necessary clothes, which I knew would be quite expensive? But I recovered soon from my momentary laxity on facing the crisis with determination. I went for searching the conductor of the coach to inform him  about my loss. While entering I did notice a few railways staff with their blue-white dresses. Fortunately at that time, a person with that kind of official dress was going through my coach. He happened to be a railway security person. I tried to inform him about my loss, but he could not make out anything from me. All other passengers were also looking at me. But I was not sure whether they could understand my English.  I was feeling quite helpless.  I took the person near the luggage cell, and waved my hand to signal that I had lost mine.
The security staff brought the coach conductor within a few minutes and he tried to talk to me with a few English monosyllables. Through a bit of sign language and a few broken English words he understood that I lost my luggage at the Airport Terminal Station. He asked me to accompany him and also to take my belongings with me. He took me to another coach and asked me to take an empty seat and wait for him (all by signs and hand movements). With an empty look and also empty stomach as well, through semi-transparent window glasses, I was staring at the fast moving outside world glittering and simmering with Japanese city lives! My student also called me to enquire about my whereabouts and they (Jit and his friend) were completely taken aback to know that I left my luggage at the terminal! They just completed their dinner and were having a nice stroll in a park near the ocean in Yokohama.
“Should I come Sir?”
“No way! It won’t help. Let me see how it goes,  and let you know.”
The conductor came with a device, which appeared to me something like a walky-talky and was telling something in Japanese with the device. I guessed he might be talking with a railway staff at Narita Terminal 2 station informing about the lost luggage. But after finishing his talk he placed it before me and was waiting for some actions on my part. I was looking at him without understanding at all what he was expecting from me. He again took the device and spoke something in Japanese and placed it before me. Then I noticed there was something written in English.
“What is the color of your bag?”
It’s a machine which translates Japanese speech in English text.
“Blue”, I informed.
The machine converted my English speech in Japanese text.
“What were there?”
“Clothes, and a file.”
The conductor again spoke something. It printed something like “We go.” I looked  at him with some confusion. He spoke again.
“Get down at the next station.”
Further with his next speech, he assured me by showing the text, “I get down with you.”
I said, “Okay. Thank you very much.”.
The kind conductor again informed me through that machine that the next station was Tokyo and it would take another 40 minutes more to reach.
When the train reached Tokyo, I got down in a confused and uncertain state, as I did not find my friend while leaving the coach. But as soon as I stepped on the platform, I found him behind me. There I found two of his colleagues waiting for us. One of them came forward to me and said in broken English, “Your bag  fine.”
I told, “Fine? Okay. How to get it?”
The staff used his device of speech to text translator and showed me the text, where it was written, “Bag found.”
I heaved a sigh of relief and asked, “Where it is?”
Again through the device came to know, “It is still in Narita Airport Terminal 2 station. You need to go back and collect.”
They helped me to get into a train going to Narita Airport Terminal 2 and finally I could retrieve the bag from the ‘lost and found’ section located at the same station. I was lucky that the incident happened in Japan, a country I found the safest to travel having a social fabric vibrant with honesty and friendliness. 
I cited the above incidence to showcase an example that how AI and Machine Learning (ML) could transform our social interaction and remove the barrier of language and distance. The speech to text cross-lingual translation has become matured and robust enough to get entry in our daily business, and I was a direct beneficiary of this technology.
There could be many such examples. In fact, it is quite natural to the young millennial generation to live with Internet driven business and social practices, many of which are getting enriched each day by new innovations primarily through applications of AI and ML. People are accustomed to use Google Maps to look for  a new place, hotels, restaurants, museums, etc., make online booking of hotels, taxi, air and train tickets, ordering a pizza or  a computer and performing many such various activities . 
Like speech to text, text to speech synthesis has become also matured enough for some of the languages and used in various applications.  Suppose the said cross-lingual gadget, which came to my rescue in Japan, is improvised by addition of another text to speech module, it would act as a human bilingual interpreter among two individuals talking in two different languages. It is exciting to think its applications in a country like India which has twenty two constitutionally recognized languages for communication.  Recently my son forwarded me a video clip, which they created describing how they had developed a technology for synthesizing speech only  from lip movements of speakers in English using deep learning technology. The demonstration was quite amazing and according to him was appreciated by none other than Andrew Zisserman of Oxford University, who is a pioneer in advancing research in Computer Vision. Andrew might have been by nature too generous to encourage young researchers, but I myself, was quite moved by the quality of their speech synthesis through lip reading by a machine. In addition, I was  also impressed by its professional presentation of the story line. So I asked him who had lent the voice in describing the background, which sounded with a very professional accented articulation. I got surprised to know that the whole narration in the background was generated through text to speech synthesis. They only prepared the text of description and fed them to the application synthesising it into a well-articulated speech. I could not distinguish  the voice as artificial and machine generated, though the speech segment synthesized by their algorithm from lip movement had artificial intonation. 
This is where we stand today. What was unimaginable even a decade ago, is now at our door step with awesome clarity and reliability! It is not true that no-one thought about these scenarios. For a long time (at least from sixties of the last century) researchers were breaking their heads  to overcome these barriers, and develop  reliable and robust solutions of problems like speech to text or text to speech synthesis, face recognition, machine recognition of objects,  generation of  description  of scenes and phenomena, diagnosis of diseases, converting images of printed documents to electronic forms, autonomous ground vehicle navigation, commanding robots for  various services, and many other challenging problems. In particular, on the onset of digital revolution in the nineties of the last century these efforts got multiplied by many folds due to the progress in sensing technology, availability of data in digital form and processing them in general purpose computing platforms. Out of these efforts, a few applications were trickling down to solve these problems in restricted environments. One of their major bottlenecks was to apply them in a free unrestricted environment with a robust and reliable performance guarantee. But the advancement that we saw in the last decade, has brought us a qualitative change in their solutions to remove these limitations, for which they are progressively getting integrated from research laboratory to  our daily businesses. 
A new era of technological revolution?
Naturally the question raised at this point is that are we entering into a new era of technological revolution, a revolution due to AI and ML? If so, what would be its impact to our society. How would it reshape the social interaction and human relations with the productive system? Only a few decades ago we witnessed another chapter of industrial revolution, known to be the era of digital revolution, which transformed our society to such an extent that our days before mobile phones and internet services looked prehistoric. Many of us may turn out to be living fossils to our present generation and may find ourselves out of the society without a credit card, email ID and a cell phone connection. The digital revolution came with the phenomenal growth and technological advancement in semiconductor industry in fabrication of integrated chips, digital electronics including sensing and rendition of multimedia content, communication and computing technology. The gadgets, such as phones, cameras, computers, etc.,  what were limited to a few in the society for their high cost and high technical barrier, become available widely at a fractional cost, with higher quality of services and of smaller sizes. The technology also revolutionized the communication infrastructure culminating in wide penetration of cellular wireless  services, data communication and internet services in our society. This has ushered us into an era of new innovations in information processing with increasing capability of handling a large amount of data due to exponential growth in storage and computing capacity. All these advancement and growth could have been perceived as a natural fall out of the digital revolution. So what qualitative changes have been brought further in the productive forces, so that we are considering another quantum leap in a new era of technological revolution? 
If we observe previous industrial revolutions, each of them was a fall out of a new technological innovation which had introduced revolutionary changes in the ways production and commerce were organized. Subsequently these also  brought significant changes in our social practices and social relations, creating clear distinctions between societies who had embraced new technology and who did not.  The first industrial revolution (1760-1830) was driven by steam engines. And we could see that this was the era, when large capitalist production system started to grow up and brought new social relations so that old feudal systems did crumble against the onslaught of a new order of bourgeoisie. After a brief period of steady growth, the second stage of industrial revolution (1860-1914) began with the discovery of electro-magnetism and harnessing electricity in the production system. The period had seen revolutionary changes in our understanding of nature and natural phenomena. The discovery of fossil fuel and its use in automobile further accelerated its growth. The capitalism ruled supreme in this stage, so did the conflicts among industrially advanced nations for capturing the markets of their colonies,  leading to two world wars subsequently. The concept of new social order also grew strong from major proponents such as  Karl Marx and Frederik Engels, which led to revolutionary movements to bring  new political and economic structure in Russia and later in China, and subsequently in many other countries. 
After the second industrial revolution, there was a steady growth and expansion of industry and commerce, but there was no major change in the factory based production system. With the development of digital technologies, this process was further accelerated. But it took a major leap with the rapid advancement of computing and communication technology.  It is difficult to identify a single invention or discovery leading to this state of affairs. It was the culmination of several simultaneous  technological advancement, such as  in fabrication of semiconductor devices, space technology and remote sensing, computer hardware and software, digital data and wireless communication, audio-visual and imaging, medical imaging, biomedical devices, and so on. We may mark  the period of technological advancement during early eighties of the last century to early years of first decade of this century as that of the period of ‘digital revolution’ (roughly from 1984 to 2004). Then there has been post digital age advancement, which played the crucial role in bringing radical changes in our daily life,  social interaction and engagement with the production system. During this period we saw tremendous expansion of internet services, computing resources, mobile networks,  and penetration of smartphones even to the low income section of the society. 
Hardly one and half a decade passed in between. Is it not too early to declare arrival of another new era of technological revolution, the era of AI and ML? Can we not consider present technological progress as the continuation of the same digital era? Is there any departure in our mode of interaction with the productive forces? Is there going to be any significant reshaping of society? To assess the impact of AI and ML in today’s and tomorrow’s society, we need to address these vital and crucial questions. As an individual we have limited roles to influence the progress in science and technology. But  as a social being we should be aware,  what is coming to us as a fall out of this progress and to decide how to harness this new technological advancement for the benefit of our society in general.

Present era: expectation and outcome 
Let us review how we reacted at the advent of  digital technology, internet, mobile communication, smart phones, social networking, e-commerce and so on.  No doubt, there was high hope all around, and there were good reasons for that. Once I heard from a very distinguished speaker who was very enthusiastic about  three great benefits of internet, namely, Google Search Engine, WikiPedia and YouTube. It was a lecture during the Diamond Jubilee celebration of our Institute (2011-2012). According to him they provide great opportunities of learning and thus could act as the instruments for liberating an individual from ignorance and making her  more confident in exploring life and unknown territories. At that moment probably we all agreed.  There was no reason to doubt his observations, as all could share the benefits of these services with the expansion of internet and digital infrastructure. But we did not see then the flip side of the same coin. After a decade now, we find how individual liberty and freedom has become a commodity in lieu of availing these services, putting ourselves under an increasingly intensive surveillance system!   
The other expectation was on strengthening of democracy as the gap between administrators and common people would be bridged by this new technology. Peoples’ voice and opinions would be more effectively  shared and heard in policy making to the benefit of the majority. Many of us shared this optimism, though I had a debate with one of my friends, presently a director in one of our premium Institutions,  on how the media would be free of control from rich and powerful! That was around the beginning of this millennium.  In fact, a decade later we witnessed  the positive role of social media and electronic media in inspiring protests and movements against the autocratic regimes in Middle East in 2010-11. There were initial successes in bringing down a few autocratic regimes and dictators. But the history taught us now that very soon this euphoria turned into nightmares! In absence of any progressive ideology, very soon these regions became the hunting ground of religious fanatics and neo-liberal rulers of today’s world, backed by their multinational corporate houses. 
If we consider present state of affairs, we would find that in the electronic media, and social networking platforms common people’s voices are hardly audible. We get all sorts of stories about  victories and defeats of our political masters, wars and violence, natural calamities and occasional worries of  climate change, and  the glittering colourful worlds of celebrities. But  rarely you find any concern for issues related to a common man! Hardly any article on their distressed conditions in economic crisis, their political and economic demands and grievances against governance, their fights and movements against the undemocratic laws and acts!  It is not only done by flooding the media with the propaganda of  ruling sections, but also by active suppression of free expression through coercive laws and blocking of internets.  In today’s world probably Hitler and Goebbels would have been more successful in hypnotising their target audiences by parroting same stories and hate speeches millionth times without any accountability and hindrance, thus giving least regards to their truthfulness! That has become the unfortunate state of affairs in many such democracies! Even there are business houses who are paid for promoting such campaigns! What was there previously  paid advertisements on a few prints of news media, and that too with some legal restrictions, has become an easy to access chattering mouthpiece of a hundred headed monster for the unscrupulous rulers  of our society. Eventually we find that the digital revolution swept away all these regulations to allow hate speech, mass shaming, trolling, and naked campaigning of half truths and lies targeting every individual, an apparent beneficiary of its world wide connectivity!
The third positive impact of digital revolution was to make the world more integrated by removing the barriers of distance and national boundaries. In fact, neo-liberal policy makers during this era drew ideological support from this technological advancement welcoming free movement of people in a global market. We were elated to think about a world without any national boundaries thriving with fraternity and brotherhood, peace and prosperity! But if we consider the present situation, we find a world with rising animosity and hatred against the migrant population, giving way to rise of ultra-nationalism at various corners of globe.  Instead of universal bonhomie and fraternity, wars, violence, and terror attacks  have become the order of the days!
Finally if we consider the distribution of wealth and income of the society, we would again find another disappointing scenario. It was quite natural to expect that with the embrace of digital revolution the society would be rich and prosperous, and each of its members would be benefited due to many fold increase of productive forces. But what effectively we see is that in almost in every country there is a rising inequality in wealth and income among the population. To be precise we may take an example of my country India. The  Gini index of India in 2011 was 35.2, which steeply rose to 47.5 in 2018, very close to some of sub-Saharan countries in Africa! It is a worrying factor as  with such an inequality in a society, a democracy cannot function. Either the political order would move toward more equitable distribution by curtailing  the monopolistic trends of big corporate houses, or be dictated more and more by them in framing economic policies and political laws to safeguard their interests! 
I may be sounding over-pessimistic and would have been very glad if I could have sketched a happy and rosy picture of our glittering world! I left my dreamy days long before, yet I was hopeful of finding a world more rational and humane! Instead we find a world with bitterness and sorrows, and full of dissent but without any political voice guided by a strong humanist ideology! Moreover due to massive and accelerated exploitation of natural resources, global warming and climate change are waving red flags to very existence of our civilization.  With such a heavy heart at this critical juncture let us look at the magical world of AI and ML and try to understand what would be the natural fall out if the current trend continues!  
AI-ML: the genesis and growth
Artificial intelligence caught the imagination of researchers since the beginning of computing with electronic circuitry. That the machines would be able to think or act like a human, play games, diagnose diseases and treat patients, was dreamt by many visionaries such as Allan Turing,  Allen Newell, Herbert Simon, John McCarthy, Marvin Minsky and many others in the early age of computing. The term AI was coined by John McCarthy in 1956 in a workshop at Dartmouth College, USA, where AI as a discipline of research got recognized. Machine learning is a specialized area of research in AI, which considers empowering a computer program meant to perform a task to improve the performance with increasing experiences of handling input data. Arthur Samuel of IBM coined the term in 1959. There were ups and down in the progress of these research areas, which started with a promising note but got dampened due to limitations of technology and material conditions in seventies and early eighties of the last century. Later, with the advancement of digital and computing technology, and expansion of data communication infrastructure, there have been significant advancement in these areas. The techniques of  “support vector machines” (SVM),  “decision tree”, “random forest”, “artificial neural network”, “Bayesian network”, “hidden Markov and conditional random field models”, etc.,  are being increasingly used in solving many challenging problems, which are otherwise hard to crack using deterministic algorithms of traditional computing. In 1997, IBM’s Deep Blue, a  chess playing computer, using AI based search techniques  in a parallel computing  environment could beat then reigning world champion Garry Kasparov in a six games series by winning three, losing two and keeping a match draw. Incidentally a year before the great champion grand master had beaten its previous version of chess playing program. 
Post digital revolution period saw  a steady development of theory and practice in these areas. The period also saw the emergence of new technology leaders, such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, etc., who started acquiring a vast amount of data of users of their systems, their behaviours and business transactions either directly or indirectly from their business partners. They rolled out a different business models by offering some of their services free to their common users, but charging from their clients (usually corporate houses and Government agencies) on advertisements and providing relevant statistics related to marketing, etc. Various other types of specialized data repositories, satellite images, business data from online shopping and trading systems, banking, etc., augmented this process further and different types of services are increasingly being provided on analysing these data. AI and ML techniques have become de facto choices in advancing these technologies. Then with the emergence of general purpose graphics processing unit (GPGPU) based computing, deep learning based techniques have taken their roots in researches in these areas. They have been found to be providing solutions at remarkable improved performances, and thus enabling deployment of  these systems in practice in real life. From 2015 onward, AI-ML techniques using deep learning based neural architecture began to perform wonders in natural language processing, audio-visual and speech processing, computer vision, robotics  and almost in every areas of science and technology for modelling a process with the precondition that a large amount of labelled data are available, which should also be  generated from the same process. The core of this computation involves  optimization of an objective function of inputs and outputs  of a very large model, which may have millions of parameters. That is why the necessity of a very large amount of labelled data, and also a very powerful parallel computing environment to finish computation within a reasonable time interval (if not days, should not be more than a few weeks!). The theory and proponent of this computation dates back to eighties of the last century, when David Rumelhart, Geoffrey Hinton and Ronald Williams developed back propagation algorithm for optimizing artificial neural networks. Later  in 1990s Yann LeCun and his coresearchers brought the concept of convolutional neural network (CNN), a biologically inspired network for classification of objects. However, the technology and material condition of getting a large labelled dataset were not yet ready then! Then in 2012, AlexNet, a deep neural architecture designed by Alex Krizhevsky, then a student of Geoffrey Hinton, showed how this could solve a hard problem such as classifying images of objects of 1000 categories (ImageNet dataset) with significantly higher accuracy than the traditional techniques of ML. This has opened the magic box of deep learning and many such neural architectures are subsequently being proposed with increasing performance on the same and many other  datasets solving various tasks such as object localization and classification, face recognition, action recognition, image captioning, generating description of  a scene, language translation, speech to text synthesis, etc.  In fact this technology has become the wonder tool to create those magic boxes of cross-lingual translators as I mentioned in the beginning of this story. Many such wonders are either already on the shelf or waiting to roll out in near future. We have become used to take help of navigation guidance using maps and satellite images while traveling by car or walking the streets. Often we interact with chat bots which take our queries and try to resolve them. Even all such text based interfaces are increasingly replaced by free speech conversation with tools such as Siri, Alexa, etc. Autonomous driverless cars have passed many miles of testing on roads. Though there were a few accidents and hiccups, it is expected that they would be running on our streets within a few years. So does drone based deliveries and surveillance systems. Air taxis on metropolitan sky line may also be flying in this decade. In every sector there would be automation which would perform like an intelligent professional person of that trade. For example, in a hospital we may be screened initially by a robot-physician before meeting the specialist doctor. In judiciary, an optical character recognition (OCR) and natural language processing (NLP) based system  may summarize the case history from the documents for presenting to a lawyer. 
The future looks quite exciting! You turn over pages of science fiction books of yesterdays, you would find we are almost there! Except the fact, that we are also suffering an existential threat due to impending secular doomsday prediction from climate scientists  and also due to the intensified arms race and war mongering of the present rulers of the world order! It is no doubt that AI-ML techniques, in spite of their great potential to become a great benefit to humanity, are serving their interests and   sharpening their arsenals for keeping their house of cards intact!
Ruling an individual
One of the mottos of  modern  digital  world is nourishment of absolute  individualism. This may happen even by bringing total alienation of a person from the society in which he or she lives. That the technology which played a  positive role in liberating a person from ignorance by bringing the  world at her door step, could  effectively also imprison her in a glittering  virtual world. In manufacturing and production also due to automation and invention of small, portable but powerful tools and machinery, the necessity of organized labour has been greatly reduced. Working from home, replacing regular employment by contractual jobs,  running major businesses in a multi-tiered subcontracting  system, etc., have become common practices in industry. This was also the period when social welfare states get withered by the onslaught of neo-liberal policy makers paving the way of unhindered privatization of essential services and resources, and thus accelerating accumulation of wealth only to a tiny fraction of population, members of big business and corporate houses. Naturally the tension and dissent in the society has been simmering all around the world. AI-ML technology has become a great weapon to these masters of the society to rule an individual. If we would like to name a few widely used applications of AI-ML techniques in today’s world, the first and foremost would be in surveillance. Profiling a user has become common business practice of these big corporations in absence of any law or regulations regarding such acquisition of data and their uses for commercial purposes. Later  some countries in the west, brought a few regulations.  But on several occasions those were found to be flouted at the risk of facing meagre penalties from the regulating authority. Sometimes users are encouraged or forced to allow intrusion to their privacy and sharing of data to these service providers to avail their services, effectively turning themselves into commodities of data products. Many governments are also increasingly forcing their citizens to acquire digital identities and to avail essential services through online transactions. Through their digital foot-prints, people could be easily brought into their surveillance systems, and monitored by automated systems to raise a red flag for any kind of opposition to establishment. That is the task set to  AI-ML techniques for serving  watchdog agencies  and big-brothers of today’s political order. The technology can greatly help them locate a single voice of dissension and suppress it at their mercy. With the spread of terrorism and anarchism in the conflict torn today’s world, it has become easier for the rulers to convince their citizens to be subjected to these surveillance systems. Apart from user profiling by internet based various service providers, and sharing the data with the Government agencies by law,  throughout the world there are arrangements of putting video surveillance systems in place. There is a steady growth of this industry. In 2014, the number of CCTV installations was such that for every 30 persons in this world, there was one such system.  I do not have the present statistics, but won’t be surprised if the number of systems has been doubled by this time.
Reshaping our society
At present it may be difficult to conclusively say that AI-ML has led us to a new technological era, but what we could say without hesitation that the social practices and modes of interaction for availing essential services will have marked departure in coming years from what presently being followed. There would be self serving kiosks  for various operations and transactions. Some of these are already in place in airports, railway counters, etc.  This would be expanded to tasks involving both manual and intellectual labour. For example, in Japan various kinds of robots are being increasingly used at  different places of work such as schools,  hospitals, etc. They are used in place of human security guards for periodic inspection of  a site. They are also designed to provide various domestic services aiding the aging population. Industries are being increasingly automated with different kinds of robots. Different economic reports had already identified a large categories of jobs of human employment that would be extinct in near future.  
Even highly professional jobs may be replaced by robots and cyborgs.  In a hospital, you may have to report to a cyber-doctor. Human teachers in class rooms would be replaced by cyber-instructors through video lectures or online composition from a knowledge base created by domain experts. Even in cultural landscape, various performing artists may be replaced by robo-artists saving the exchequer of producers and directors. There may be a robot-singer popularizing new composition at the same level of proficiency of any expert singer or musician. In sports, various robotic teams would participate to compete with each other. It is true that all these fundamentally would be product of human intellects, but in a market oriented economy, they would also make certain human trades extinct. 
The infrastructure for communication and commerce will have many more changes in coming years. There would be new rules and regulations making mandatory adoption of new technological advancement. The road, signalling and traffic rules would be overhauled to get the autonomous driverless cars on streets. Drones and aerial vehicles would be used for transportation and delivery of commodities. The policing in the streets and mob controlling  may be done using various automated surveillance tools and mobile robots. In Airport, possibly you may have to get your face scanned for verification with the photograph printed in your identity card  before boarding the aircraft. Even  one may have to enrol with periodic updates of biometric signatures of face, fingerprint, DNA finger prints, etc., for accessing various essential services, such as banking, traveling, shopping, health care, etc.  Without such a digital identity a person would be an outcast in a society. In the business world, your digital identity may also become a commodity to sell and to keep protected. Various technologies and counter-technologies would be developed to steal and safeguard someone’s identity.
In the present world, we are already observing how the advancement in digital technology changed the nature of warfare and made a huge gap between a technologically  advanced and a backward country. What was a field demonstration in the first gulf war (1990-1991), had become regular in modern warfare causing immense misery of people in affected lands. People of defeated nations have no other option than leaving their destroyed homes and devastated lands, and migrating to a relatively safe corner of foreign countries. World wide migration for war and economic break down have become the order of these days. Recent progress in AI and ML did not make any change in the present situation.  Neither it is expected, as the technology itself never provides a political solution, rather becomes another tool of dominance of the rulers.  In future, there  will be  more arsenals to their armies as  derivatives of this technology.  The military of a country may have an army of robots. The days are not far behind when man and machine will fight each other in the battle field. With increasing precision striking capability, advanced satellite imaging and navigation systems, we have already seen, how a general of a country can be killed out of the blue ignoring ethics and norms of the civil world! In the great epic Mahabharata, it is considered the death of Abhimanyu broke all the civilities and norms of that mythical era in wars between the two warring factions. In this twenty first century,  this unfortunate incident might have ushered us  into an era with new codes of ethics in warfare, which would be devastating for our race!
Concerns and hope
Any technological advancement brings new hope and demands for improving our life with increasing comfort and happiness. With newer insight of nature and living world, and their applications in solving various challenging and critical problems, we are better prepared in handling uncertainties, and mitigating crisis. AI-ML based technology has great power and potential to make our life and society better.  Already there are ample proofs of its role to the benefits of the mankind. It  accelerates discovery of new medicine and vaccine in treating patients of life threatening diseases. It  not only removes barriers of distance and time in social interactions, but also of languages, physical disabilities, and many other challenges. It forecasts weather with much greater precision and accuracy helping better organization, management and planning of various events and activities. In facing critical challenges such as, impending crisis of global warming, fossil-fuel dependency, diminishing resources of drinking water, etc.,  AI and ML have great potential to play positive roles.
The irony is that in spite of all these technological progresses, the chaos and anarchy in our society are ever increasing. On international arena, if we note, these are accelerated on the emergence of  AI and ML as a strong  driving force of the technological progress.  This may not be considered as a mere coincidence. This raises  future concerns of our civilization. They are not so benign to be ignored among the euphoria of magical world on adoption of AI-ML solutions. 
One of the worrying factors is that, overuse of technology in decision making may lead to loss of rationality among humans, driven by their blind faiths on cyborgs and automated systems. Even from the philosophical angle, it is the empiricism, which  takes over on logical discourses on settling debates and hypotheses. Dominance of machine learning in technological advancement would provide strong incentives in strengthening these views. Fuller context and perspectives may be ignored and trivial generalization would put a major hindrance in taking rational decision, thus in effect blocking the scientific progress. In our present era itself, we could observe this trend. In our academic world, often citation numbers, number of publications in rated journals and conferences, etc.,  get more priority in decision making on short-listing and selection, than going through the contributions of candidates. Even though there may be significant margins of errors in  the reports of various automated indexing databases, they are accepted without any hesitation in making such decisions. Empiricist philosophy of ML has another problem. It accepts the continuance of prevailing characteristics of learnable data, thus legitimizing  existing bias in our society. The privileged section would take most benefits of this progress in the present social order.
One of the deadliest examples of blind faith on functioning  of  automated system is the way US multinational company Boeing allowed the introduction of a new automated navigation module named Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) in their new aircraft model Boeing 737 MAX, whose malfunctioning was identified as the root cause of two back to back plane accidents in Indonesia and Kenya, in October 29, 2018 and March 11, 2019, respectively. The company was so confident about the reliability of its function on keeping the nose of the plane down to prevent it from getting it too high and causing a stall, that they did not mention this feature initially with sufficient clarity to regulators. Prior to the first accident in their aviation manual recommended actions in case of failure and malfunctioning of this system were missing. Even after the first accident, it was  a half-hearted acknowledgement of the fact with  remedial suggestions to the pilots in the event of such rare incidents. Had it been the case that Boeing discontinued their misplaced confidence and faith on such automated system immediately after the first accident, the second unfortunate incident in Kenya could have been avoided! 
The other concern  is the lack of accountability in the fallout of wrong decisions from automated systems. Final victim is the user or customer. Even today, any error generated from such systems, however serious it is, finds no accountability from their operators or implementers. Even the transparency on placing the accountability is also missing there. This adds complexity to the redressal of grievances and taking remedial measures. The unfortunate incidents of  Boeing plane accidents, as mentioned before, also showed us how difficult it is to implicate any person or organization in such cases. In first few months, the aircraft company and their lobbyists had made all possible efforts in implicating pilots and airlines! Due to world-wide concern on safety of air travel and subsequent  grounding of the said model of aircraft, the company finally had to step back in acknowledging the unforeseen technical fault in their design. 
And the last but not the least concern of the present and future era is the increasing unemployment in population. The bleak picture of abolition of jobs is predictable, and undeniably a foregone conclusion. What is not clear, at what rate new jobs would be created. In earlier industrial revolutions, these concerns were routinely raised. But with the emergence of newer jobs, new workforces had been created. New technological progress required increasing participation of educated and skilled labours, both manual and intellectual. Automation in a factory abolished many manual jobs, but created various other ancillary industries to support it. But it is becoming more and more clear that there has been increasing gap between the rise of productivity due to automation and growth of jobs since the beginning of this millennium. In 2011,  Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee  of  the MIT Sloan School of Management in their book “Race against the machine” had shown how the automation through AI-ML technology is spearheading the steep rise of productivity, but halting the growth of employment in USA. The difference in automation through AI-ML from the industrial automation of previous centuries is that they will not only replace many manual jobs, but also drain away many jobs of brain. In this kind of scenario there will be a highly specialized work force, presumably very small in number, and a vast majority serving them primarily engaged in service sectors. But the concern is that a far greater number will remain unemployed or under employed. This would not only heighten inequality in income among these two sections, but also lead to a situation, when requirement of higher education to the lower income group will vanish. Higher education would be accessible to only the small privileged section and used as a tool for maintaining this social division. Master and slave relations will flourish more in the society. At its peak, there would be two strata in the society sharpening the division of rich and poor: masters and their cronies in a small minority, and slaves in the vast majority! The outcome would be the complete negation of what we expected  from the technological advancement in the beginning! With high hope we had embraced  the digital revolution as it empowers an individual to step out from kupa-madukata (self-confinement through ignorance). But under the new technological advancement with its wide spread tentacles of surveillance, freedom and liberty would be a caricature of the past! Under this scenario, we may see an aberration in Marxian analysis of social progress, when capitalism may lead to a slave society!  
Naturally, this would not be a free lunch for the masters! There would be resistance from the multitude going through this transformation. As a reaction, the state would be more and more dictatorial leading to an Orwellian dystopian society. Still our only hope lies with this resistance of people, as we find at various corners of globe today. This  would grow day by day against the tyranny and oppression, and hope to take a political shape to turn back the tide towards socialism and people’s democracy!
14.02.2020